Get a fresh taste!

Abortion

Today’s Bible reading begins one of my favorite books of the Bible: Paul’s letter to the Romans. Paul begins his Magnum Opus Systematic Theology by laying out the gospel message with a description of man’s descent from the time of Creation to his day — and to our day.

Paul says that God’s wrath is already being revealed against ungodliness because mankind has been able to clearly see God’s revealed glory, and yet refused to acknowledge God’s existence. He wrote this around AD 57. And yet, little has changed.

When the Jewish people cried out to the prophet Samuel for a king (1Samuel 8), he warned them that they didn’t need a king, since God was their king. The people said they wanted to be like other nations and to do that, they needed a king. The people kept asking Samuel for a king until he gave them what they asked for: King Saul. And he did everything that God warned the people he would do. (1 Samuel 8:11–18) They got everything they wanted.

In Romans 1, Paul says that God gave the people what they wanted. And the very thing that they wanted became their judgment.

Claiming to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man, birds, four-footed animals, and reptiles. Claiming to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images resembling mortal man, birds, four-footed animals, and reptiles. Therefore God delivered them over in the desires of their hearts to sexual impurity, so that their bodies were degraded among themselves. They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served what has been created instead of the Creator, who is praised forever. Amen.
They exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served what has been created instead of the Creator, who is praised forever. Amen.
For this reason God delivered them over to disgraceful passions. Their women exchanged natural sexual relations for unnatural ones. The men in the same way also left natural relations with women and were inflamed in their lust for one another. Men committed shameless acts with men and received in their own persons the appropriate penalty of their error.
And because they did not think it worthwhile to acknowledge God, God delivered them over to a corrupt mind so that they do what is not right. They are filled with all unrighteousness, evil, greed, and wickedness. They are full of envy, murder, quarrels, deceit, and malice. They are gossips, slanderers, God-haters, arrogant, proud, boastful, inventors of evil, disobedient to parents, senseless, untrustworthy, unloving, and unmerciful. Romans 1:22–31 (CSB)

Finally, Paul complete his description of God’s judgment against Fallen Mankind:

Although they know God’s just sentence—that those who practice such things deserve to die—they not only do them, but even applaud others who practice them. Romans 1:32 (CSB)

Paul says, it wasn’t enough that people sinned against God. They took it one final step further: they encouraged other people to sin.

Even in my lifetime, I have witnessed this descent played out in society’s acknowledgement to leniency to approval of the sins that Paul spells out here. God has given mankind what mankind has asked for.

Sexually confused, they abused and defiled one another, women with women, men with men—all lust, no love. And then they paid for it, oh, how they paid for it—emptied of God and love, godless and loveless wretches. Romans 1:27 (The Message)

Here in verse 27, Paul is referring to Isaiah’s warning:

Woe to those who call evil good and good evil, who substitute darkness for light and light for darkness, who substitute bitter for sweet and sweet for bitter. Isaiah 5:20 (CSB)

Application

You may not have personally participated in, approved, or encouraged other people to commit the sins that Paul spells out so clearly. But Mankind has. And America has. We, believers, are at least partially to blame for society’s sinful demise. We have not been the salt and light that we are called to be. (Matthew 5:13–16)

Believers, we must confess and repent for our own participation in the sins of our culture. And we must beg for God’s forgiveness, grace, and mercy for our nation’s sins. Our only hope of avoiding God’s wrath being poured out on us is to repent and pray. (2Chronicles 7:14)

Pray for God to send a spiritual awakening and revival, unlike anything our nation has ever experienced. Pray for the Holy Spirit to convict believers of their own sin, as well as our sin of silence while the world has gone to hell around them. Pray that pastors will faithfully speak God’s Word and disciple new (and old) believers in the faith. And pray that believers will hear God’s invitation to seek Him with all that they are.

If we don’t pray, no one will. Lost people definitely won’t do it!
Prayer is our job!

Enter your email address to have my devotionals delivered to your Inbox.


On January 30, I asked the question, How low can we go? The context of this question had to do with how Virginia and New York seemed to be besting each other to be more liberal than the other.

And then I read about yesterday’s Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act (S. 130) that failed to pass in the Senate. If passed, the Bill would protect babies who survived an abortion, granting them full, protected human rights and would require medical professionals to report such situations.

Unfortunately, the bill which received somewhat bipartisan support failed to reach cloture (2/3 majority vote). Three Democrats voted in favor and no Republicans voted against, and three Republicans did not vote, Lisa Murkowski (AK), Kevin Cramer (ND), and Tim Scott (SC).

The bill couldn’t get a 2/3 majority vote! Who can’t vote to protect a living, post-birth baby?! This shouldn’t be considered a “Right vs. Left” issue. This is a “Right vs. Wrong” issue. Can we not agree on this basic definition?!

President Woodrow Wilson was right when he said of the US Senate,

“the only legislative body in the world which cannot act when its majority is ready for action. A little group of willful men, representing no opinion but their own, have rendered the great government of the United States helpless and contemptible.”

I commented on Facebook this morning, “The fact that this legislation didn’t sail through with 100% support is a terrible indictment on our nation. I honestly cannot see how any decent human being could vote against infanticide. God have mercy on us!”

“Decent human being”. Evidently, the bar for my definition is set too high.

It is past time for God’s people to fall on our knees and cry out to God to have mercy to us and to grant us the grace of a deep repentance. We need a Spiritual Awakening greater than the First and Second Great Awakenings to right this ship.


I must admit, I’m a little confused as people (of all political persuasions) call for Virginia Governor Northam to resign over a yearbook picture.

My confusion has more to do with why people have called for his resignation over this picture and not over his comments earlier this week calling for infanticide:


“If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians & mother.”

Now, I am not in any way excusing the picture. But we are seriously messed up as a nation when a picture upsets us more than killing of a newborn baby. At least Virginia lawmakers voted to table the new abortion bill. Unfortunately, the vote was along Party lines.

#Godhavemercy #Godforgiveus #spiritualawakeningnow

I have had more discussions with Facebook (and real) friends over the past few days. In one, I asked my liberal friends to please explain how they can justify (and celebrate) the new New York abortion law.

I had only two people to attempt to answer the question, but they actually dodged it. After several back-and-forths on the issue of adoption and the need for more pro-life supporters to step up and walk their talk by supporting women who were choosing life for their baby, I tried to reign things back in for my original question. Here’s how I finally wrapped it up.


My original point was to ask the most basic of questions. If we can’t agree on the answer to the most basic of questions, we’ll never be able to agree on the follow-up answers. Too often, instead of answering the question, people ask more questions.

Unfortunately, it appears that “we” can’t agree on the answer to the most basic of questions. Even those who call themselves “Christians” (which we don’t always agree on that definition either!) can’t agree on the answer to the most basic of questions.

Take away all the arguments of “reproductive rights”. Take away even the arguments for/against abortion. Take away the arguments of what a woman chooses to do with her body. Take away all of these things that distract from THE most basic of questions.

“What is life?”

Can we not all agree that a baby that has entered the birth canal is in fact a baby whose life should be protected by law? Evidently not.

That was the question answered by delegates in Virginia on Tuesday when the committee voted to table the bill proposed by Kathy Tran. The vote to table the bill came down to 5-3 decision along party lines. Ms Tran acknowledged that her bill would not prevent an abortion on a fully-developed fetus when the mother was dilating.

And in his attempted explanation, the Virginia Governor Ralph Northam explained what would happen to a baby that survived such an abortion. “If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians & mother.” (Note that Northam used the term “infant” three times. He acknowledged that this was a human baby and then said that discussions would determine its fate.

WHAT?????

When party lines are more important to us than protecting a baby in the birth canal, something is seriously wrong with us as a nation.

We must pray!

It seems like liberals are trying to out-liberal each other. Well, not to be outdone by New York’s recent abortion law, Virginia is considering revising its abortion laws.

The bill allows for abortion even during labor. Yes, you read that correctly. And if a baby is delivered? Virginia Governor Ralph Northam responded,

If a mother is in labor…the infant would be delivered. The infant would be kept comfortable. The infant would be resuscitated if that’s what the mother and the family desired, and then a discussion would ensue between the physicians & mother.

Note: Governor Northam says, “The infant would be delivered.” Infant. Not “clump of cells”. Not “product of pregnancy”. Infant. Three times the Governor used the term “infant“. There is absolutely no way to say this bill is anything but a push for infanticide.

Where is the outcry?!

Enter your email address to have my devotionals delivered to your Inbox.


 


 

My recent Tweets!